...good accounts of the world in all of its slippery and transforming conditions. I think my problem, "our" problem, is how to have simultaneously an account of radical historical contingency of all knowledge claims and knowing subjects, a critical practice for recognizing our own "semiotic...

...feminist theory's contributions to solving those tensions over praxis outlined by Haraway: I think my problem, and "our" problem, is how to have simultaneously...contingency for all knowledge claims and knowing subjects, a critical practice for recognizing our own "semiotic technologies" for making meanings, and a nononsense...

...separates both sides of the equation (and keeps both sides within the same sentence!): So, I think my problem, and "our" problem, is how to have simultaneously...contingency for all knowledge claims and knowing subjects, a critical practice for recognizing our own "semiotic technologies" for making meanings, and a no-nonsense...

...of absolute difference. Once again, Haraway's formulation of the problem seems useful: So, I think my problem, and "our" problem, is how to have simultaneously...contingency for all knowledge claims and knowing subjects, a critical practice for recognizing our "semiotic technologies" for making meanings, and a no-nonsense...

...a theoretical position that, to use the formulation of Donna Haraway, can "simultaneously [provide] an account of radical historical contingency for all...knowledge claims and knowing subjects . . . and a no-nonsense commitment to faithful accounts of a 'real' world" (1988: 579; emphasis in original). Haraway's...

...have in mind.4 Assuming a postmodern critique of totalising discourse, she argues that feminists need, simultaneously: [...] an account of radical historical...contingency for all knowledge claims and knowing subjects, a critical practice for recognising our own "semiotic technologies" for making meanings, and a no-nonsense...

...without thereby extrapolating from these judgments to all other situations. In her words: So, I think my problem and "our" problem is how to have simultaneously...contingency for all knowledge claims and knowing subjects, a critical practice for recognizing our own "semiotic technologies" for making meanings, and a no-nonsense...

...contradictions — of views from somewhere. (Haraway 1988:196) For Haraway, "our problem [as science analysts] is how to have simultaneously an account of radical...contingency for all knowledge claims and knowing subjects, a critical practice for recognizing our own 'semiotic technologies' for making meanings, and a no-nonsense...

...constructivism conjugated with semiology and narratology." She calls for a feminist account that is " simultaneously an account of radical historical contingency...knowledge claims and knowing subjects . . . and a no-nonsense commitment to faithful accounts of a 'real' world, one that can be partially shared." As...

...project in science, but with equal aptness across disciplines, explains the difficulty thus: I think my problem, and 'our' problem, is how to have simultaneously...contingency for all knowledge claims and knowing subjects, a critical practice for recognizing our own 'semiotic technologies' for making meanings, and a no-nonsense...