Negation, Subjectivity, and The History of Rhetoric

Front Cover
State University of New York Press, 1996 M11 1 - 440 pages
Vitanza introduces his book with the questions: "What Do I Want, Wanting to Write This ('our') Book? What Do I Want, Wanting You to Read This ('our') Book?" Thereafter, in a series of chapters and excursions and as schizographer of rhetorics (erotics), he interrogates three recent, influential historians of Sophists (Edward Schiappa, John Poulakos, and Susan Jarratt), and how these historians as well as others represent Sophists and, in particular, Isocrates and Gorgias under the sign of the negative. Vitanza concludes—rather rebegins in a sophistic-performative excursus—with a prelude to future (anterior) histories of rhetorics. Vitanza asks: "What will have been anti-Oedipalizedized (de-negated) hysteries of rhetorics? What will have they looked like, sounded, read like? Or to ask affirmatively, what, then, will have libidinalized-hysteries of rhetorics looked, sounded, read like?"
 

Contents

but a DilemmathatwouldBecome a Trilemma
10
The Sophists?
27
The Death of Rhetoric and History and the Sophists
44
Excursus The Negative Aesthetics and the Sublime terror
57
Helenism?
123
Isocrates the Paideia and Imperialism
139
Isocrates the Logos and Heidegger
159
Heidegger Wesen and The Rectors Address
191
Gorgias Accounting and Helen
235
How to Recount One Two and Some MoreAristotle and
245
Gorgias Some More and Helens
271
Excursus Preludes to Future anterior Histories of Rhetorics
307
Notes
343
Works Cited
393
Index
419
Copyright

Excursus A Feminist Sophistic?
207

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (1996)

Victor J. Vitanza is Associate Professor of English at the University of Texas at Arlington. He is the editor of two books, PRE/TEXT: The First Decade and Writing Histories of Rhetoric.

Bibliographic information