Getting Away with Genocide?: Elusive Justice and the Khmer Rouge Tribunal
Twenty-five years after the overthrow of the Pol Pot regime, not one Khmer Rouge leader has stood in court to answer for their terrible crimes. Tom Fawthrop and Helen Jarvis show how governments that often speak the language of human rights shielded Pol Pot and his lieutenants from prosecution during the 1980s.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Rebirth of a Nation and the Beginning
Justice and Reconciliation
The Gangs of New York
Clinching Convictions the Challenge
Other editions - View all
accepted acts Affairs agreement Assembly assistance authorities Bangkok border bring called Cambodian government camps Chapter Chea China Chinese Commission committed Committee conference continued Convention Corell Council court crimes defence delegation Democratic Kampuchea deputy discussed documents draft established evidence Experts Fawthrop final forces foreign former genocide given Group held Henry Kissinger human rights interview issue January judges justice Khieu Samphan Khmer Rouge leaders killings later lawyers leng Sary letter major March meeting military negotiations Nuon Office organisations Paris party peace People's period Phnom Penh points Pol Pot Pol Pot regime political position President Prime Minister prison prosecution regime Representative resolution responsible role rule seat Secretary Security side signed Sihanouk Special Thai Thailand trial tribunal United Nations Vietnam Vietnamese vote western York
Culture and Performance: The Challenge of Ethics, Politics and Feminist Theory
No preview available - 2007
All Book Search results »
After the Killing Fields: Lessons from the Cambodian Genocide
Limited preview - 2005