Indefinite Pronouns

Couverture
Oxford University Press, 2000 - 380 pages
This is an open access title available under the terms of a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licence. It is free to read at Oxford Scholarship Online and offered as a free PDF download from OUP and selected open access locations.

Most of the world's languages have indefinite pronouns, that is, expressions such as someone, anything, and nowhere. Martin Haspelmath presents the first comprehensive and encyclopaedic investigation of indefinite pronouns in the languages of the world, mapping out the range of variation in their functional and formative properties. He shows that cross-linguistic diversity is severely constrained by a set of implicational universals and by a number of unrestricted universals.

The author treats his subject matter broadly within the Humboldt-Greenberg tradition of language typology, but also considers the contribution of other theoretical approaches to an understanding of the functional and formal properties of indefinite pronouns. The book is organized into four logically ordered steps: selection of a part of grammar-- indefinite pronouns--that can be identified across languages by formal and functional criteria; investigation of the properties of indefinite pronouns in a world-wide sample of forty languages; formulation of generalizations that emerge from the data, summarized in the form of an implicational map; and theoretically informed explanations of the generalizations, which go beyond system-internal statements, appealing to cognitive semantics, functional pressures, and universals of language change (especially grammaticalization).

 

Autres éditions - Tout afficher

Expressions et termes fréquents

Fréquemment cités

Page 304 - Now we know that God heareth not sinners: but if any man be a worshipper of God, and doeth his will, him he heareth. Since the world began was it not heard that any man opened the eyes of one that was born blind. If this man were not of God, he could do nothing.
Page 255 - When all denied, Peter and they that were with him said, Master, the multitude throng thee and press thee, and sayest thou, Who touched me? 46 And Jesus said, Somebody hath touched me: for I perceive that virtue is gone out of me.
Page 138 - And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear you, when ye depart thence, shake off the dust under your feet for a testimony against them. Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city.
Page 100 - Principle A: An anaphor must be bound in its governing category Principle B: A...
Page 304 - For to which of the angels did HE ever say: 'You are MY Son, today I have begotten you?' And again: 'I will be to him a FATHER, and he shall be to ME a Son?
Page 181 - As far as particular meaning properties are concerned, the most outstanding single concept that reduplicative constructions recurrently express in various languages is the concept of increased quantity.
Page 204 - V-NI can be explained by the discrepancy between the semantics, which is that of ordinary sentence negation (or nexus negation, in Jespersen's terms), and the surface expression of negation, which is on a participant rather than on the verb in this type.
Page 199 - Negative interpretation of elliptical indefinites: tendencies52 a. (negative) The more additional functions a direct-negation indefinite is used in, the less likely it is that it may be used elliptically with a negative interpretation. b. (positive) The fewer additional functions a direct-negation indefinite is used in, the more likely it is that it may be used elliptically with a negative interpretation.
Page 40 - In such sentences the speaker is committed to the existence and identifiability of the entity.
Page 166 - the conjunction (both ...) and corresponds logically, pragmatically, distributionally, and intonationally to the universal ALL, the disjunction (either ...) or to the existential or particular SOME (...)" (Horn 1989:254). Hence, it can be assumed that for a finite number of entities, a universal statement is equivalent to a conjunction, and an existential statement is equivalent to a disjunction. The problematic examples are generic or law-like statements in which the predicates express a kind of...

À propos de l'auteur (2000)

Martin Haspelmath is a member of the scientific staff at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Liepzig. Previous positions have included Wissenschaftlicher Assistent in the Department of English at the Free University of Berlin, and Programme Assistant to the ESF-sponsored Programme in Language Typology (EUROTYP). He is the author of 'A Grammar of Lezgian' (1993), and co-editor (with Ekkehard Konig) of 'Converbs in Cross-Linguistic Perspective' (1995).

Informations bibliographiques